Pages

Ads 468x60px

Fertile Women More Likely to Wear Red

That little red dress or pink sweater may be sending more of a message than you think: it could be an overt sign of a woman's fertility, a new study suggests.

In the study, 124 women ages 18 to 47 were asked what color shirt they were wearing, and when they had their last period. From the latter question, researchers calculated which women in the study were currently at the peak of fertility in their cycles (about six to 14 days after the last period).

Those who were wearing red or pink were about three times more likely to be at peak fertility than those who wore other colors, the study found.

Previous research showed that some animals put on displays during their fertile periods to attract mates, but no such displays were known to exist in humans, the researchers said. The new study provides some evidence to suggest there may be a way to directly observe ovulation — the time of the month when a woman is most likely to become pregnant, the researchers said.

However, more research is needed to replicate the findings in a larger population. The study also did not measure hormone levels, which is a more accurate way to determine peak fertility.

The researchers plan to conduct a follow-up study that asks women why they chose to wear a particular color that day, said study researcher Alec Beall, a doctoral student at the University of British Columbia.

Many cultures associated the color red with love and passion, and previous studies have shown that men rate pictures of women as more attractive if they are surrounded by a red border.

Some studies have found that women report increased sexual desire around peak fertility, greater attraction to masculine features, and a tendency to wear more revealing clothing, the researchers said.

The reason behind the new findings is not clear, and future studies are needed to determine whether women wear red or pink around ovulation because they want to look sexy, the researchers said.

It could also be that women may wear these colors because they are attention-grabbing, and women — consciously or subconsciously — want to bring attention to themselves at a time when they feel sexy, even if they are not necessarily seeking the attention of men, the researchers said.

A follow-up study by the same group of researchers found that fewer women wore red at their peak fertility in the summertime, compared with the wintertime. A possible explanation for this finding is that women may be more likely to use the "wearing red" strategy in situations when they cannot use other attention-getting strategies, such as wearing less clothing (which would be easier in the summertime), Beall said.

The study was presented here at the annual meeting of the Association for Psychological Science on May 26. It has been accepted for publication in the journal Psychological Science. Beall conducted the work with Jessica Tracy, associate professor of psychology and director of UBC's Emotion & Self Lab.

Grimsby mosque hit by suspected arson attack

Police say two arrested after fire at Grimsby Islamic centre, while mosque chairman reports being attacked by petrol bombs

A mosque chairman has described how he was inside an Islamic cultural centre with a young family when it was hit by a suspected arson attack.

The Grimsby Islamic Cultural Centre was allegedly targeted by petrol bombs on Sunday night, despite an increased police presence in the area following another attack on the complex three days ago.

Humberside police said a fire was started at the centre on Weelsby Road shortly before 10pm. No one was injured. Two people were arrested by officers patrolling in the area.

The chairman of the mosque, Diler Gharib, told the Grimsby Telegraph: "We had just finished our prayers and were discussing how to thank our neighbours for the support they have shown us over the past few days when we heard a bang and saw fire coming under the door.

"I grabbed a fire extinguisher and put it out and then two more petrol bombs hit the fire escape and the bin so I had to put those out too."

Gharib said police had been monitoring the mosque after it was targeted by youths last week and officers were able to quickly apprehend two suspects.

He said the murder of Drummer Lee Rigby in Woolwich was a criminal act that had nothing to do with the Muslim faith.

He said: "We have all been feeling on edge and now this has happened. It's not just the people at the mosque we are worried about, it's our wives, daughters and children who are out in the community."

In a statement, Humberside police said: "It is too early to speculate why the fire was started, however anyone with any information who could assist officers as part of the investigation are urged to call the Humberside police non-emergency number 101."

She added: "The force is currently aware of a number of messages which have been posted on social networking sites by a small minority of individuals.

"These messages appear to be an attempt to incite trouble by posting messages inviting people to assemble and cause trouble at particular locations. Those people should be aware that we are monitoring these sites in Humberside and we will take action against those intent on attempting to incite violence or post messages of a racial nature."

The Islamic centre in Grimsby is part of a complex that includes a mosque that was targeted by youths last week.

Eleven teenagers were arrested after that incident, which happened after a party spiralled out of control, police said. The 16- and 17-year-olds were arrested on Thursday.

Following Sunday night's incident, the MP for Great Grimsby, Austin Mitchell, said attacks on mosques and other Islamic institutions were playing into the hands of terrorists who wanted community conflict.

Mitchell told BBC Radio Humberside: "It's sheer, simple stupidity.

"I'm appalled and shocked. I didn't expect this in Grimsby. These idiots, whoever they are, are playing directly into the hand of the terrorists."

Woolwich attack: caution urged over crackdown on extremist websites

Theresa May's comments prompt internet experts to warn that rush to ban websites would be crude and counterproductive

Experts have urged caution in the face of pressure on internet companies to remove extremist websites and calls by MPs and others for a clampdown on the dissemination of online jihadist rhetoric.

The home secretary, Theresa May, said on Sunday she wanted to see what more could be done to police online messages preaching violence or jihad, adding: "One of the issues we need to look at is whether we have got the right processes, the right rules in place in relation to what is being beamed into people's homes."

However, Tim Stevens, the co-author of a major piece of research in 2009 into countering online radicalisation, warned that little had changed since the report, which concluded that any strategy that relies on reducing the availability of online content alone was bound to be crude, expensive and counterproductive.

He added that the calls for the revival of the communications data bill, "a law enforcement, intelligence gathering measure", were being conflated in the wake of the killing of Drummer Lee Rigby with "an idea that somehow taking down internet sites and so on is a way of countering radicalisation".

"Anyone who knows anything about the internet knows that just because you take something of the internet is likely to be back on it again within an hour, or downloaded onto hard drives," said Stevens, an associate member of the Centre for Science & Security Studies at King's College, London.

He added: "My feeling is that the police have got better things to do, and so do the intelligence services, who already have the tools and powers to see who is seeing material, downloading it and putting it up. The police are in a different position because when they see it they are supposed to do something about it. I suspect they turn a blind eye much of the time because they have got some criminals to catch.

"With an issue like this, poor legislation can be worse than no legislation."

Jamie Bartlett, the director of the Centre for the Analysis of Social Media at Demos, added: "One of the big problems is that a lot of the material which is used to radicalise people – and many observers have a problem with that term – or used to get some form of motivation and justification, is actually legal."

"It is sermons of a religious nature on YouTube that do not call people to act. It is videos of massacres in the Muslim world which are on BBC as well as everywhere else. So there is always a big problem with trying to crack down. The other problem is playing catch up, taking material down which pops up again somewhere else."

Speaking on Sunday on the BBC, May said: "There has been discussion of a greater use of court orders to block some sites, but it will be difficult to decide whether responsibility will lie with the Home Office or internet service providers."

The search engine Google has said that it relies on the public to flag up incendiary material. YouTube said videos of a "purely religious nature" would remain online.

Google's Eric Schmidt: change British law and we'd pay more tax

Executive chairman defends company's 'fiduciary responsibility' in face of criticism and says 'what we are doing is legal'

Eric Schmidt, Google's executive chairman, has continued to defend the company's tax affairs, insisting it would comply with British law if it was changed and claiming to be perplexed by the debate.

In a phrase less snappy than the more celebrated "don't be evil", Schmidt said Google had "a fiduciary responsibility to our shareholders" that prevented the internet company from paying more tax abroad. However, he said: "It's not a debate. You pay the taxes."

Google has come in for escalating public criticism, including unusually frank words from senior politicians, since the House of Commons public accounts committee took it to task this month over figures that revealed payments of £3.4m in tax on £3.2bn of sales to customers in Britain last year, with sales technically accounted for under the low-tax regime of Ireland.

However, Schmidt told BBC Radio 4's Start the Week that if Britain wanted to collect more tax, it should change the law: "What we are doing is legal. I'm rather perplexed by this debate, which has been going in the UK for quite some time because I view taxes as not optional. I view that you should pay the taxes that are legally required.

"If the British system changes the tax laws then we will comply. If the taxes go up we will pay more, if they go down we will pay less. That is a political decision for the democracy that is the UK."

So far, those leading the democracy have yet to bring action to back up their words, but deputy prime minister Nick Clegg said he had raised the issue directly with Schmidt at a Downing Street meeting, after Labour leader Ed Miliband used the platform of Google's "Big Tent" event to express "deep disappointment" with the company. Miliband said: "When Google goes to extraordinary lengths to avoid paying its taxes, I say it's wrong. And it's not just me that says it, it's Google's founding principles, and it's crystal clear from them."

However, Schmidt said Google's pledges on social responsibility were not incompatible with a legalistic approach to paying taxes: "I do not agree with this and the reason is that at least under American law we have a fiduciary responsibility to our shareholders to account for things properly, so if we were, for example, to just arbitrarily decide to pay a different tax rate than we were required to, a more favourable one for example to a particular country, how would we account for that?

"How would we file the necessary paperwork, what would be the legal consequences in other countries?

"Somehow these questions are ignored in the debate. We are very happy with whatever the countries all come to agreement on. We are not particularly upset about it."

Schmidt concluded: "Our position is very simple: taxes are not optional, we pay the mandatory amount."

Bedroom tax 'could make thousands of poor people homeless'

False Economy says severe shortage of one-bedroom properties will hit tens of thousands unless new homes are built

Tens of thousands of the poorest people in Britain risk being made homeless because of the bedroom tax, according to an analysis of councils' assessments of the welfare cut.

From last month, housing benefit has been reduced to council or housing association tenants who ministers claim have more bedrooms than they need.

Data from 107 local authorities shows 86,000 households have been forced to look for one-bedroom homes, of which only 33,000 have become available in the past year.

The figures mask considerable regional variation. In Essex, 100 social housing tenants in Rochford were deemed to require a one-bedroom property because of the benefit changes but only five had become vacant the previous year. In Gloucester the council said 111 one-bed homes had been available last year, but almost 500 households needed them because of the bedroom tax.

Inverclyde in Scotland said 1,100 households would need to move into one-bedroom homes – of which just 96 had been free to rent last year.

Any tenants "under-occupying" their properties will lose 14% of housing benefit – an average of £9.25, according to the analysis – until they move into a one-bedroom home. The government's impact assessment last summer warned that 35% of claimants affected "would be quite or very likely to fall into arrears if their housing benefit were to be reduced".

False Economy, the trade union-backed campaign that used freedom of information requests to get the data, said it had chosen to focus on one-bed properties as ministers had been forced to acknowledge last year that there was a "shortage" of such homes but pressed on regardless with the policy.

A spokesman for False Economy said: "The disparity between the demand for one-bed housing and a whole year's worth of supply is so severe that there is little hope of plugging the shortfall." Without new homes being built, "tens of thousands are now facing a crisis".

One of these is Kenneth Unwin, a joiner and bricklayer, who lives alone in a two-bed house in Chester-le-Street, County Durham. He uses one bedroom as a storeroom for his tools. Barely able to afford his £80 a week rent since becoming unemployed two years ago when the firm he worked for went under, he says he cannot absorb April's benefit cut.

Unwin, who often does odd jobs for neighbours for food, said: "I am unemployed so I don't have much money. I am very careful but the extra £10 a week is impossible for me to pay. The problem is there are no one-bed properties around here. I cannot see how I can afford private sector rents. I will be walking the streets in a few months."

A study by the National Housing Federation, which represents housing associations, warned ministers that families unable to get a one-bedroom social home all moving to the private rented sector could increase benefit claims by £143m a year – despite government claims the policy will save money.

David Orr, chief executive of the federation, said: "For some the only option is to move into homes for private rent, which in many parts of the country are much higher than social rents, so the government won't make the savings it hopes.

"The bedroom tax is an ill-thought-through and unfair policy that will cause distress for hundreds of thousands of people forced to move from homes and communities in which they have lived for years. It must be scrapped now."

Homeless charities also called for the policy to be abandoned. Leslie Morphy, chief executive of Crisis, said: "Without enough one-bedroom homes to move into, tens of thousands are powerless to avoid the anxiety, debt and arrears caused by the bedroom tax. Our fear is that many, through no fault of their own, will in the end become homeless as a direct result of government policy. Ministers must accept these facts and rethink the bedroom tax now."

Labour described the policy as the "worst combination of cruelty and incompetence". Liam Byrne, the party's spokesman on welfare, said the bedroom tax was a "mess". "Thousands of vulnerable households are trapped by this hated tax with no option to move, and if tenants are forced to go homeless or move into the expensive private accommodation the tax payer will be left to pick up the tab."

The government said those losing out could make up the shortfall by moving "into employment, working more hours, or taking in a lodger". A Department for Work and Pensions spokesman said: "Not all people affected by the changes to the spare room subsidy will need to move – it is wrong to suggest that all those impacted will have to downsize."

Tiger that killed zoo worker 'dragged her into its enclosure'

Police contradict idea that keeper went into tiger's pen, and do not believe there was a risk of animals escaping to public areas

A zookeeper mauled to death by a tiger was attacked while carrying out routine duties, police have said.

It has emerged that Sarah McClay, 24, was in the staff section of the big cat enclosure building at South Lakes Wild Animal Park, Dalton-in-Furness, Cumbria, when the rare Sumatran tiger confronted her.

Animals are supposedly prevented from entering the staff area and officers are investigating how it got in.

Detective Chief Inspector Bob Qazi said: "We are still trying to establish exactly how and why the tiger has been able to get from the pen into the staff area and at the moment believe this to be because of a human or system error, or mechanical failing, or a combination."

The owner and founder of South Lakes Wild Animal Park, David Gill, had previously claimed that McClay "inexplicably" broke health and safety rules and was actually inside the animal's enclosure when she was attacked on Friday.

He had said: "After investigation by the authorities here and the police, it does seem that she just basically failed to follow the correct procedures.

"For some unknown reason, an inexplicable reason, because there is no reason for why she did it, she opened the door and went into the tiger enclosure and straight into the tigers, and now we'll never know why."

However, after interviews with witnesses, police now believe that the 10-year-old tiger entered the staff area, grabbed McClay by the head and throat and dragged her into a separate area.

It fled when shots were fired.

McClay was taken by air ambulance to Royal Preston hospital but died later from her injuries.

Qazi said: "I want to emphasise there is no suggestion of any foul play or any issue of suicide or self-harm from the enquiries we have made and evidence we have.

"What has become apparent from our enquiries with witnesses is that Sarah was going about her routine duties and was in the staff section of the enclosure building, which animals are not allowed access to, when a tiger has entered it from an adjacent pen and confronted her.

"The tiger has then attacked Sarah, taking her from the building into the open-air external enclosure area where Sarah was left and later attended by staff and paramedics.

"It is vitally important that we discover what exactly happened in the big cat enclosure building that led to Sarah coming into contact with the tiger.

"The building was secured at the time and we do not believe there was any risk to the general public from animals escaping into public areas of the park

"We are continuing to liaise closely with Sarah's family and our thoughts are with them, and her friends, at this very difficult time."

He said the tragedy had had a deep impact on workers at the park.

McClay, who was from the Barrow area and had worked with big cats for many years, was "very experienced" with tigers according to Gill.

Before the most recent police announcement, Gill said it was against strict safety protocols to walk into the tiger's cage, and that the zoo had been praised for its safety standards following a major inspection last Monday.

He added: "None of us have been able to come up with a really reasonable conclusion.

"All we know is that no one else was involved, there was nobody with her, and for some unknown reason she opened a door and walked straight into the tigers."

Gill said he had no wish to have the tiger, which is one of the rarest in the world, put down.

""He didn't make the mistake. He was just there. It's so difficult because we don't blame him for what has happened," he said.

McClay's family paid tribute to the emergency services and hospital staff and have set up a memorial fund in her memory.

They said: "We'd like to thank you all for your kind words. We are still coming to terms with what has happened.

"Investigations are ongoing and it may be sometime before a full picture emerges of what happened and how this tragic accident came to pass."

They have set up a fund in memory of McClay to support red squirrel conservation, a cause the zoo worker was passionate about.

Donations and messages of condolence have been left at www.justgiving.com/SarahMcClay.

Barrow council is also continuing its investigation into the incident.

Woolwich murder: armed police arrest man on north London street

Officers in balaclavas detain man near Highbury Corner, the ninth arrest in relation to murder of Drummer Lee Rigby


Police investigating the murder of drummer Lee Rigby made a ninth arrest on Sunday afternoon when armed officers in balaclavas seized a 22-year-old man on a north London street.

The man, who was arrested on suspicion of conspiracy to murder, was detained by detectives from the Met's counter-terrorism command and specialist firearms officers.

According to witnesses, the officers got out of a silver car and a white van to arrest the man on St Paul's Road near Highbury Corner at around 2.45pm.

Five officers stood over the man, who sat on a wall until uniformed police took him to a van and drove him away.

One witness, who did not wish to be named, said: "The guy was on a push bike when the police came out of nowhere and wrestled him to the ground." Two other plain clothes officers – identifiable only because one was wearing a Metropolitan police cap – were nearby. A Scotland Yard spokesman said: "A 22-year-old man was arrested by officers from the MPS Counter-Terrorism Command investigating the murder of Lee Rigby. He has been taken to a south London police station where he remains in custody."

The spokesman confirmed that no shots were fired.

Detectives made three arrests on Saturday detaining two men, aged 24 and 28, at an address in south-east London, while a 21-year-old man was arrested in the street in Charlton Lane, Greenwich. All three were arrested on suspicion of conspiracy to commit murder and Tasers were used on the 21-year-old and the 28-year-old. The Met said on Sunday night that the three had been released on bail to return pending further inquiries.

The two men suspected of murdering Rigby – Michael Adebolajo, 28, and Michael Adebowale, 22 – remain in custody in separate London hospitals after being shot by police on Wednesday. The Met said they "will be formally interviewed when it is possible to do so".

A 29-year-old man arrested on suspicion of conspiracy to murder has been released on bail, while two women, aged 29 and 31, have been released without charge after they were held on Thursday, also on suspicion of conspiracy to murder.

The Met said officers were working "tirelessly and painstakingly" to uncover the full circumstances surrounding the attack and repeated an appeal for anyone with information to come forward.

Speaking outside Scotland Yard, deputy assistant commissioner Stuart Osborne said: "We have been undertaking a complicated and often rapidly developing round-the-clock investigation since the horrific murder of fusilier Lee Rigby in Woolwich on Wednesday afternoon.

"The Metropolitan police service counter terrorism command, supported by national counter-terrorism officers and the security service, continue to work tirelessly and painstakingly to uncover the full circumstances relating to this attack.

"We are pursuing a significant amount of CCTV, social media, forensic and intelligence opportunities and have active lines of inquiry."

Osborne said that while the investigation was going well, much remained to be done and repeated appeals for information. "The public have been very supportive in relation to our appeals for help. I now ask that anyone who knew the two men who carried out this attack to consider if they have any information which may be useful to contact us in the strictest of confidence." A few hours before the latest arrest, Rigby's widow, Rebecca, visited the scene of his death with the soldier's mother and stepfather. Clutching a Peppa Pig soft toy, she pinned a balloon bearing the words "dad in a million" close to the spot where her 25-year-old husband was killed last Wednesday. The card attached read: "In memory of my wonderful husband."

One of Rigby's sisters left a bottle of his favourite HP sauce among the cards, candles and flowers, while a card written on behalf of the couple's two-year-old son read: "My Daddy, my hero. Your memory will live on in me. You made me proud and I will miss you for eternity. Love always, Jack." The soldier's mother Lyn, who held a teddy bear, and his stepfather, Ian, consoled each other as they walked along the wall of flowers, while dozens of passers-by lined the street in silence.

Lyn Rigby collapsed on to the edge of the pavement as she wept, and sat on the kerb while other family members wrapped their arms around her. Some of the group appeared too overcome with emotion and got back inside the row of cars that had taken them to the scene.

Others then crossed back to the other side of the road, which had been closed by police, where they continued to examine some of the many tributes. They put their arms around one another and hugged before all getting inside the cars just after 1pm.

The vehicles then drove off in the direction of the entrance to Woolwich barracks, just a few hundred yards up the road from the murder scene. The emotional scene was watched by hundreds of members of the public who had also gone to pay their respects to the soldier. They were held back by police while the soldier's family visited, and looked on in respectful silence during the 20 minutes they were there.

The rules

The essential etiquette guide to modern life

Opposing gay marriage

Even on the right wing of the Conservative party, it is no longer considered appropriate to express horror at the idea of homosexuality. The modern mode is for such prejudice to be draped in legal arguments and camouflaged in pseudo-philosophy.
Thus anyone objecting to a law allowing gay couples to marry should affect to be entirely relaxed about the gayness of the matter and fixate instead on the technical question of marriage – how it is defined, where it can take place etc. The next step is to wonder whether priests and clerics from other religions should be obliged to officiate at gay weddings and whether, indeed, their freedom to refuse to do so is adequately protected. By this rhetorical sleight of hand, it becomes possible to present oneself as defending the rights of people who don't like gay marriage instead of the rights of gay people to get married. The bigot can thus be presented as the victim.

The correct term for an argument contorted in this way is "bone-headed", after Peter Bone, the Tory MP for Wellingborough who specialises in this rhetorical device. The unit for measuring the depth at which homophobia is buried in bone-headed quibbling is the Tebbit. The average level of bone-headedness on the Tory right is generally referred to as the Tebbit norm.

The art of not panicking

There is a famous old poster that dates from the Second World War (but was never used as public propaganda) urging citizens to "Keep Calm and Carry On". Several years ago, this artefact from a more stoical era found new nostalgic resonance and became fashionable, almost ubiquitous. At times of stress and anxiety – the aftermath of a terrorist attack, for example – it is tempting to deploy this motto. That temptation must be resisted. The "Keep Calm and Carry On" meme has been exhausted by overuse. This applies to all variants and subversions. There is no reworking or infusion of irony that can salvage it. Move on.

Talking about the weather in an era of climate change

May has been colder than usual – in other words, colder than people remember last May being and perhaps even the May before. It is customary under such circumstances to speculate about global warming. It is standard practice in this form of speculation to eschew any basis in science. It is also customary to confuse the relationship between weather, which is what is going on outside your window right now, and climate, which is the much bigger system enveloping the whole planet. Being in possession of any technical understanding of the way these two things interact means immediate disqualification from conversing on the subject.

Insulting people on Twitter

Since allegations of a specific nature, even when inferred cryptically, can be libellous, the safest and by far the most popular method for expressing an opinion about someone on Twitter is incoherent abuse.

Excitement about the Xbox 1

It is inconceivable to someone not already in possession of a games console that a new piece of hardware can provide any more gratification than whatever piece of equipment it was everyone was talking about before. Non-gamers find any discussion of games baffling and mildly alarming since they know it is probably culturally important in some way but have no grasp of how or why. Gamers should express their enthusiasm with sensitivity to this total lack of comprehension.

Revisionist spellings for names

The decision by Colleen and Wayne Rooney to name their second son Klay has provoked much snobbish derision. This is quite unjustified. There may have been a practical necessity in deploying the unconventional spelling, eliminating any danger of the child being mistaken for a type of soil, for example. The era of orthodox name spellings is over. Innovation and improvisation are entirely acceptable. In certain circumstances, when a traditional moniker feels unusually out of date and anachronistic, a degree of orthographic sprucing up is actually recommended. Thus, while technically incorrect, it may be preferable by the time of the next election to refer to the prime minister as Davyd Kamyron.

Terrorism: life-denying ideologies have no place in this country

So entwined have the English Defence League and radical Islam become, they might as well be married

With the predictability of acne spreading on a teenager's face, the British right and left used the ritual slaughter of Lee Rigby to confirm what they already knew. The security establishment called for the revival of its pet project to allow spies to engage in blanket web surveillance without saying why it would have helped. For the "anti-imperialist" left and Greens, who have never wanted to look clerical fascism in the eye for fear of what they may see, the attack told them that the west was to blame – as it always must be.

Neither could accept that political violence is mutating in ways that give past cliches a musty smell. For the first time since 9/11, the similarities between violent movements in the west are more important than their differences. They replicate and feed off each other. So entwined have the English Defence League and radical Islam become, they might as well be married.

The security services are not saying whether the Woolwich suspects had links with international terrorism. Perhaps they did, but no one would be surprised if they spent their days in Britain listening to Anjem Choudray and surfing the web. This is not the way it used to be. We still have cases where terrorists follow the traditional pattern. The courts convicted Richard Dart in March after he had gone to Pakistan to work on a plot to blow up families mourning the army's dead at Royal Wootton Bassett. But in most instances, with Osama bin Laden dead, and his associates blown apart by drone strikes, we are now reduced to talking about the once fearsome al-Qaida as "a franchise", a phrase that trips too easily off the tongue.

The best response to those who argue that the "root cause" of the terror is western foreign policy is to reply that it may be in some cases. But when you face a psychopathic movement, it says more about you than it if all you can see is a protest against whatever you happen to dislike about your government.

The Pakistani Taliban attacks girls who want a decent education. (And some elements of the British left ought to show more pride that Drummer Rigby and his comrades fought in Afghanistan to stop the Afghan Taliban doing the same.) It also murders Shia Muslims, Christians, Ahmadis and Pakistani liberals.

In Timbuktu, the Ansar Dine destroyed beautiful mosques, which did not accord with their ultra-puritanical version of Islam, an act that to my mind seemed truly Islamophobic. Meanwhile, Boko Haram terrorises northern Nigeria and al-Shabaab terrorises Somalia. None of these organisations is terrorising because they want to make a legitimate if regrettably bloody critique of "the west". They terrorise because they want to establish a misogynist and inquisitorial theocracy.

Though they share much of the al-Qaida ideology, and in the case of elements within al-Shabaab, proclaim allegiance to al-Qaida, they cannot reasonably be described as "franchises". Unlike al-Qaida in Iraq in the 2000s, they do not take orders from a central command. Indeed, the US military has ensured there is no central command to take orders from.

The uncertainty applies to the experience of far luckier countries in the rich world. Rather than the mass murders of 9/11 and 7/7, we are seeing small and vicious attacks that are rarely planned in the hills of Waziristan.

As one security source put it to me: "For the time being, terrorists threaten fewer people but are harder for the security services to monitor and infiltrate."

Alexander Meleagrou-Hitchens of the International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation has chartered the change by analysing the writings of al-Qaida leaders since the "high point" of 9/11. After Nato had driven al-Qaida out of Afghanistan, Anwar al-Awlaki, al-Qaida's most effective propagandist, could no longer dream of a global insurrection. Instead, he saw hope in the web. He wanted violence certainly. But his "44 Ways to Support Jihad" or al-Qaida's Inspire magazine, which al-Awlaki edited until the Americans killed him, shows the limitations of his approved methods of "individual jihad".

Supporters should attach "butcher blades" to the front of a pick-up truck, so that "the blades strike your targets at the torso level or higher", and drive into crowds, ran one idea. Brutal though the suggestion was, it was not a way to bring a government to its knees, as Bin Laden may have realised

His British followers were as violent and as vacuous. After Trey Parker and Matt Stone said they wanted to show Muhammad in South Park, a British Salafi website quoted al-Alwaki with approval and said: "We have warned Matt and Trey that what they are doing is stupid and they will probably wind up like Theo van Gogh if they do air this show."

Parker and Scott later created an irreligious musical for Broadway and the West End. But what with one thing and another, the religion they decided to go for was Mormonism. It is shameful to live in a society where it is easier for satirists to mock the Prophet Brigham Young rather than the Prophet Muhammed, but these are not signs that a global counter-revolution is on the march.

The attacks by radical Islamists in the west today are not very different from the attacks on mosques that followed the murder of Drummer Rigby or the bombings organised by the "dissident" IRA: small scale, mean in every sense of the word and pointless.

The similarities do not stop there. The founders of the English Defence League were inspired by Islamists who disparaged British troops. The EDL has in turn produced the Muslim Defence League. David Anderson, Britain's independent reviewer of terrorist legislation, is so concerned by the reciprocal relationship between certain religious groups and the white far right, he is thinking of investigating whether the police are treating both partners in this ugly waltz equally.

I am not trying to belittle today's violence. It is easy to imagine a one-off Islamist attack such as the stabbing of Stephen Timms or the bombing of the Boston marathon, leading to an attack on a mosque that claims lives.

I am simply saying that yet more powers for the police are not going to stop small groups of men acting almost on impulse.

It would be better if right and left in Britain could do what they have failed to do to date and condemn violence without regard for the colour or creed of the perpetrators, and without displaying an ounce of respect for the life-denying ideologies that motivate them.

Woolwich attack: 'Muslims are free of guilt. We had to condemn this killing'

A leading Islamic commentator and author reports on the swift reactions of Muslim groups to last week's killing
After Friday prayers, at the scene of last Wednesday's dreadful murder of Drummer Lee Rigby, Julie Siddiqi laid a bunch of flowers. "It was hard not to cry, especially when the imam raised his hands in prayer at the moment we laid the flowers," she said afterwards.

Siddiqi is executive director of the Islamic Society of Britain, one of the few women leading a national Muslim organisation and one of a growing number of Muslims of English origin. Her horror at the Woolwich attack is palpable: "It's echoed by the Muslims around me. There's genuine shock and outrage. The killing has really shaken people up."

The community's response was swift and unambiguous. Within hours of the incident, the Muslim Council of Britain issued a condemnation. "Whether it was to do with Muslims or not, it was right to express our horror at this disgusting event," says Harun Khan, one of the MCB's young leaders.

"But we were conscious, too, that the suspects had used Islamic words, and these would be used to demonise Muslims. We wanted people to know what happened was wrong, and there is nothing in Islam to justify it."

The MCB is an umbrella body for 500 mosques, schools and associations, so getting an agreed public statement out rapidly was difficult. "We knew it had to be quick and unequivocal," says Khan. The MCB's message was across news outlets later on Wednesday afternoon.

Social media was used alongside conventional media channels. "Our Twitter account went into overdrive," Khan says. "We were relentless in emphasising our condemnation, and amplified the voices of our affiliates doing the same. This was not just some leaders condemning the attack, it was the entire community." Attempting to guide young Muslims using social media away from Twitter hate wars and towards constructive dialogue was another aim of the quick response.

Siddiqi added: "The community is maturing. The response was different to 7 July. In 2005, our organisations weren't as developed. Now there's more confidence, Muslims are more proactive." She partly attributes this to the fact that as the length of the community's presence in the UK increases, connections between Muslims and wider society have become stronger.

As always, there was criticism by Muslims of Muslim organisations for being "apologists" through the condemnations. If these were two lone men acting against Islamic principles, and if the rest of Muslims are as guilt-free as Britain's general population, asked some, why the rush to apologise? Khan rejects this argument: "All decent people condemn such events. We do too. As members of this society, it is important we reach out and clearly express our position"

Siddiqi said she felt the need to reassure wider society and protect Muslims from a possible backlash: "We knew this incident would put people at risk, so it was a duty for us to respond."

The backdrop to their stance is the sense of a growing anti-Muslim hatred, and rise of the English Defence League.

The backlash against Muslims after the September 11 and 7 July terrorist outrages were painful for Muslims. Since then there has been a steady increase in hate crime against Muslims, amid growing poverty and the rise of far-right parties across Europe. Last week a letter to the Muslim Association of Greece threatened to "slaughter like chickens" Muslims who did not leave the country by 30 June. Many feel that a comparison can be drawn with 1930s Europe.

"Fear is widespread among Muslims," says Fiyaz Mughal, director of the Tell Mama (Measuring anti-Muslim attacks) project. There has been a very large spike in abuse, attacks and assaults on Muslims since Woolwich. "We used to receive four to eight cases every day. Since Woolwich we've had 162, from hijab and niqab pulling, to graffiti on mosques and cars. One man entered a mosque armed with knives. Mosques have been attacked with petrol bombs."

It is fashionable to deny that Islamophobia exists. "Evidentially," says Mughal, "that idea is dead. We have data that shows clear targeting of Muslims." He dismisses the idea that this arises from a sense of Muslim victimhood: "If people stop targeting Muslims then they won't be victims. Simple."

If anything, Muslims under-report attacks. "They don't want to make a fuss. They shrug it off," says Mughal. There are other reasons,. "People worry if they report attacks it will be their own details that get recorded. They're fearful how their data will be used."

One positive outcome of the tragedy is a stronger sense of community. Both Siddiqi and Khan feel that Muslim organisations have worked well together, establishing stronger relationships.

The notion of standing firm with British society is strong across the board. "All the community has so much pride in being British," says Esmat Jeraj, assistant secretary general for the Council of European Jamaats (congregations).

The mosque next door to COEJ in Streatham, south London, was used for an open-house community meeting on Thursday to discuss Woolwich. "We invited all our neighbours, local organisations, Safer Neighbourhoods teams and councillors," says Jeraj. She points out it was the only event of its kind in Streatham. "It was the imam's idea to organise it."

This open, cross-community role for Muslims is something Jeraj is keen to champion. "While we are practising Muslims, we have a responsibility as British citizens. Part of that work is countering lack of knowledge about Muslims and showing that mosques have nothing to hide, that they are open to all.

"Don't worry. We're not wishing for the government to be abolished or sharia to be imposed. We want people to know more about Muslims. We want to play our part."

Humour in the face of adversity is a British trait. TV presenters faced with the Islamic phrase "Allahu akbar" (al-laa-hoo), struggled valiantly to pronounce it, but mostly only managed "aloo akbar". What did potatoes (aloo) have to do with prayer, wondered some Muslims.

In terms of the media response to the death of Lee Rigby, aside from the ethics of publishing gory images, Muslims wondered if the event was politicised because of seeming connections to their religion. In a recent chilling murder allegedly inspired by anti-Muslim hatred, a 75-year-old Muslim man in Birmingham, returning from evening prayers, was stabbed to death outside his front door. It barely made the papers, let alone the front pages. Similar accusations of double standards were levelled at media and politicians for referring immediately to the Woolwich killing as an act of terrorism, before the facts of the terrible event had become known. .

During an early news report, the BBC's Nick Robinson described the suspects as of "Muslim appearance". He was criticised and subsequently apologised for using a phrase "liable to be misinterpreted and to cause offence". The apology was well-received but left some Muslims wondering about the predisposition of media and politicians to equate any criminal act conducted by a Muslim with terrorism.

Baroness Warsi, the minister for faith and communities, criticised media outlets for giving space to "nutters and idiots" such as Anjem Choudary, former head of the banned extremist organisation Al-Muhajiroun.

One of the suspects, Michael Adebolajo, was filmed with Choudary, and many believe Choudary may have influenced the alleged killer.

Khan says the MCB has been working to tackle the extreme messages Choudary is peddling. Just two weeks ago, Choudhary's supporters are alleged to have beaten up a Muslim man on Edgware Roadin London, in a horrific case of sectarian violence. A subsequent cross-sectarian forum co-organised by MCB posed searching questions for the police as to why this man was still at large.

Siddiqi, too, says that Muslims on the ground know of the threat that Choudary represents. "One local man at Woolwich mosque told me how Al-Muhajiroun tried to take over the mosque. They worked hard to push them out. But Al-Muhajiroun got a room from the council further up the road from which they conducted their activities."

Many Muslims feel they are tackling extremism, but that those in positions of power are letting them down. Siddiqi feels it is important to recognise that media organisations have tried hard to engage Muslim voices. "I've been doing interviews non-stop," she says.

"There's a sense of unity and purpose," says Khan. "But also a deep understanding that there's more to do. There is always more to do."

Police investigate allegations of sex abuse at Catholic boarding school

Former pupil claims monks at closed boys' school Fort Augustus Abbey committed 'systematic, brutal, awful torture'

Police are investigating allegations of abuse at a Catholic boarding school in the Scottish Highlands, following complaints of a brutal regime in which boys were physically beaten, psychologically tortured and sexually assaulted. The school closed in 1993.

Officers from Police Scotland will travel to Newcastle tomorrow to interview Andrew Lavery, 41, who for two years in the 1980s attended the fee-paying Fort Augustus Abbey, which was run by Benedictine monks. "It was systematic, brutal, awful torture," says Lavery, who says he was beaten, sexually assaulted and isolated in a locked room for days on end under "special measures". He added: "The psychological torture was the most damaging. In the end I wanted to kill myself."

Lavery claims he was beaten unconscious by a monk and lay master while pupils watched, then left at the playing fields to crawl back to school. He also says he experienced "greying", which involved other pupils pinning the victim's legs apart while his testicles were hit with a hockey stick. A monk watched without intervening. "I have had pain in my left testicle all my life," he said.

Lavery also accuses Monk A, now a cleric in England, of physically beating and sexually assaulting him. He will tell police that when he broke his leg Monk A took advantage of his vulnerability and tried to grab his testicles. "I told him to leave me when I went to the toilet, but he was standing over me. He said, 'No, you need a hand.' I heard all his heavy breathing behind me. It was the wrong sort of breathing to hear in your life. He was fumbling and I was screaming at him to get off."

Monk A is also accused of selling alcohol to underage pupils. When contacted by the Observer, he admitted giving them beer, but said: "I never beat people up and there was certainly never any sexual stuff. I don't know what he's talking about."

There has been heated debate on the school's old boys website about abuse, with some denying it took place. Des Austin, a former pupil who privately investigated abuse at the school, posted extracts from 13 separate emails he received from old boys claiming physical and sexual assault from 1954-91. "The thing that got to me," one wrote, "was the sexual abuse ... and the fact that no one would believe me. My mother said, 'priests never do such things'."

Cardinal Keith O'Brien, who resigned as Archbishop of St Andrews and Edinburgh in February after allegations of sexual misconduct, was a visitor to the school and guest of honour at last year's old boys' dinner. Jimmy Savile, who owned a house in the Highlands, was also an occasional guest and Lavery remembers his Rolls-Royce being parked outside the monastery. Lavery was in a senior position as an addictions nurse until last year when he suffered a traumatic physical injury. While recovering, he suffered flashbacks, recovered memories and night terrors. He no longer works. He has been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder and assessed as requiring psychotherapy and specialist abuse counselling.

Another former pupil, Douglas Hiddleston, from Fortrose, remembers Lavery being treated "viciously" by pupils and staff. One of the few Protestants in the school, Hiddleston says he was also targeted. "Monk A grabbed me by the throat, pinned me up against the wall and called me a Proddy bastard," he said.

Another pupil, who asked to remain anonymous, said Monk A "was the epitome of nastiness". The man, who says he was once nearly drowned by fellow pupils while staff watched, also alleges that another monk was guilty of sexually predatory behaviour and tried to "groom" him. "Seediness pervaded the school," he said.

The culture was similar for an earlier generation, according to some at the school in the 1960s. "I came close to suicide," said Sean O'Donovan, who says he was bruised for five weeks after a birching. "I just couldn't see an end to it.I tried using a rope, but it was too thin. It was very painful and, since I was trying to stop the pain, that made me think."

William Wattie, who attended from 1959 to 1964 and became a headteacher, said: "Institutionalised bullying … I could never work out where the gentle carpenter of Nazareth fitted in." He questioned "cuddling" by monks at the school's feeder primary at Carlekemp in North Berwick, which has also been linked to abuse allegations. The Catholic church in Australia accepted abuse had been perpetrated by Father Aidan Duggan, a former teacher at both Carlekemp and Fort Augustus. Duggan died in 2004.

Fort Augustus monastery, which belonged to the English Congregation of Benedictines, also closed in 1998. The current Abbot President, Father Richard Yeo of Downside Abbey, admits former pupils have contacted him regarding the school. "I have heard allegations of both physical and sexual abuse which have disturbed me. If anyone comes forward to speak to me about this, I will try to be there for them," he said.

'Knee deep in mud at an English festival? Give me Spain any day'


With the British weather always likely to turn Glastonbury or Bestival into a gruelling expedition, bookings are up by 30% this year for events abroad where fans can pay less to see the same bands – and the backdrop is the sunny Med or Adriatic

Approaching midnight at the Parc del Fòrum , the Barcelona air was still warm after the heat of the day. On stage, singer-songwriter Jessie Ware was in typically sultry form. At the back of the crowd, Gavin Blane, a 33-year-old Londoner, explained his decision to turn his back on Britain's festival circuit and head abroad.

"It's the best way to get away from our corporate jobs," said Blane. "Have a beach holiday, see some culture and party at night." Blane's choice of festival this summer came down to Glastonbury or Primavera Sound, where Brit old- stagers such as Dexys, the Jesus and Mary Chain and My Bloody Valentine are rubbing shoulders with Ware, Phoenix and Simian Mobile Disco. He has no regrets about opting for the sun. "Here you've got the beach, the hills, the sun. We all know what Glastonbury's like."

After bubbling along nicely for years, mass European music festivals have well and truly arrived. As the UK endures yet another damp squib of a spring and early summer, bookings are up 30% on last year at festicket.com, which caters to the booming demand for listening to British bands in Spain, Croatia, Sweden and beyond. It used to be that a rite of passage would be a weekend away at Reading or Leeds. These days, the average age of a festivalgoer in the UK is 36, and organisers are accused of targeting middle-aged nostalgia junkies with headliners such as the Rolling Stones and Elton John. A younger generation is looking to avoid the mud, rain and endless queues of the traditional British festival and hop on a budget airline.

Tour operators now offer bespoke European festival packages including tickets, flights and accommodation. "Taking in an overseas music festival this summer is a great way of combining two British love affairs – live music and summer holidays abroad," said Sean Tipton of the tour operators trade association Abta.

"Ticket prices in Europe are often much lower than the UK and food and beer is often a lot cheaper too. The range of options is very wide with the added bonus of more predictable weather; the traditional British festival mudbath isn't everyone's idea of fun."

Dan Fahey of Festicket said: "People are definitely looking abroad. It's the discovery angle – when you discover a new band you want be the first to hear it and tell others. This is the same."

He said: "It's not just the cheap flights and cheap beers – European festivals have really upped their game."

Enric Palau, director of Sónar in Barcelona, a pioneering electronic music and multimedia festival that is still going strong after almost 20 years, said he had seen a huge increase in the number of Britons buying tickets.

"We use museum spaces, indoor and outdoor venues in the city – quite different from an outdoor, inland event. Sonar is a city festival; it's a cultural experience in a main European destination. It's not just another headline mainstream event."

Sónar has been held in other cities too, including London (the Royal Festival Hall), São Paulo and Reykjavik.

Festivalgoers at Primavera enjoy the added bonus of a stunning urban setting built from the 1992 Olympics and looking out to a sea that last week was lit up by a full moon. James Swatton, 28, from London, said: "The architecture is stunning; it's unlike any other festival. The layout is quite incredible in the way that you can fast track your way to places. It's all facing out to sea, which is amazing. Plus I like going back and sleeping in a bed.

"You just don't get this kind of lineup anywhere else. Festivals in the UK are stuck in a rut," he said.

Pete Large, 23, agreed: "I love the architecture. It's definitely different in that there's no camping and it's all concrete. I'm used to the mud and the grass."

"English festivals are good, but only if the weather is on your side. If not, it gets frustrating and muddy," said Sylvia de Sousa, 29, from Chiswick, west London. "Being surrounded by the sea makes it feel more relaxed and the lineup is very interesting and eclectic – there's all sorts from Blur and Jessie Ware to Tame Impala."

In recent years, there has also been a surge in dance music production, which is now driving the formation of electronic music festivals. "It's cheaper to put on a festival now," said Adam Saville, clubs editor of DJ Mag. "If you want to book a DJ it might cost £500 for a couple of hours and he will turn up with his memory stick and plug it in. If you want to book a high-profile band you've got to fly the entire band over and sort out their production."

Eastern European destinations have enthusiastically embraced dance music and Croatia has fast become a popular festival destination. This summer, the country is hosting more than 16 festivals, from Love System to Unknown in mid-September – in fact there is barely a weekend when a festival is not happening somewhere along the rocky coastline. Most are UK-organised.

Saville thinks that the festival formula has changed for the better. "The Garden festival in Croatia offers a week-long festival for half the price of a Bestival or Glastonbury ticket. You can get a cheap flight there and stay for the whole week. You're basically getting a holiday and a party thrown in as well."

Croatian authorities have welcomed the tourism-boosting events. "The local authorities don't reject the idea of young people coming across; the locals very much support it," he said.

As for the pilgrim hordes from Britain, going to Croatia was one way of standing out from the crowd. Now that Croatian festivals are almost as crowded as the UK equivalents, it could be time to move on. "Bulgaria is an area that people are focusing on, Latvia has cropped up too, Poland's an interesting one as well," said Saville.

Having had some bad experiences at British festivals, Sean Baker, 24, from London, said he was sick of constantly battling against bad weather and thinks the novelty and excitement of UK festivals has worn off.

If there is a downside, it is that some of the faces in the crowd can seem disappointingly familiar: "It does feel a bit like Dalston-on-sea," admitted Baker. "It feels like we have decamped en masse to the Spanish coast."

FIVE OF THE BEST

BENICàSSIM
The Spanish beach festival features Skream, Queens of the Stone Age and Everything Everything. Held in July.
PUKKELPOP
One of the biggest Belgian open-air festivals, the lineup features Eminem, the xx and Neil Young. August.
MELT!
Located near Berlin in a disused industrial estate. Has a mix of indie rock and techno/house artists such as Alt-J, James Blake and Ellen Allien. Music runs from 3pm to 7am. By day, people relax by the lake. July.
HIDEOUT
Electronic music festival in July in Zrce, Croatia on the island of Pag. Events include pool parties, art installations and boat trips with artists such as Jamie Jones, Julio Bashmore and Four Tet.
EXIT
The Prodigy and Fatboy Slim are playing in the old fortress in Novi Sad, Serbia. July.

Woolwich attack: coalition failing to tackle extremism, says Hazel Blears

Former Labour minister Hazel Blears says funding cuts are undermining government strategy against Islamist extremism

The coalition's strategy to counter Islamist extremism is failing, according to an outspoken intervention by the former cabinet minister who ran the programme under the last government.
Speaking following the Woolwich attack, Hazel Blears MP, who as communities secretary led the Prevent strategy under Labour, told the Observer that people vulnerable to the messages of extremist preachers were being spotted too late. She said it had been a serious mistake to dismantle Labour's policy of funding local authorities that have a population more than 5% Muslim, to help them curb radicalism by engaging and funding community groups, Islamic societies and mosques.

The mother of Michael Adebolajo, one of the two men arrested over the murder on Wednesday of Lee Rigby, a soldier in the 2nd Battalion the Royal Regiment of Fusiliers, is said to have sought help at a mosque over her son's vulnerability in his teenage years, but the system did not respond. Blears, who is a member of the cross-party committee of MPs that monitors the intelligence services, said she was very worried that Prevent was now "basically dealing with people who are already crossing that line" into radicalism, rather than making an early identification of those who were vulnerable to extremist Islamic preaching. Her comments come in another eventful day following the attack.

Greenwich university confirmed that Adebolajo had studied there in 2003/2004 and 2004/2005, but said that he had been asked to leave due to his poor academic performance. The university said that the second suspect, Michael Adebowale, 22, had not attended the institution. The university announced that it was opening an investigation into any evidence of extremism on campus. Last night it emerged Adebowale had been detained by police two months ago after shopkeepers in the area had complained about his preaching activities in the street. He was released without charge.

The BNP was accused of exploiting Wednesday's attack to further its "own poisonous ends" after the far-right group announced it would be demonstrating in south-east London, where the attack took place. A huge rise in the number of anti-Muslim incidents has also been recorded, with 162 calls made to a helpline since the killing – up from a daily average of six. A YouGov poll also shows – amid a generally tolerant attitude towards Islam – an increase in the number of people, particularly from older generations, who believed there would be a "clash of civilisations" between British Muslims and native white Britons. This figure rose from 50% in November 2012 to 59% on Thursday and Friday.

Questions were being asked last night about how much MI5 knew of the two suspects, after Abu Nusaybah, a friend of Adebolajo, claimed that the secret services had tried to recruit the murder suspect in Kenya, where he was allegedly assaulted by local security forces. That claim has at least one precedent in British courts. In 2009, four Britons held in Kenya testified that they were interrogated under threat of torture by the country's anti-terrorism agency while MI5 agents declined to intervene.

Nusaybah was arrested on terrorism charges following an interview with Newsnight on Friday evening. The prime minister has announced that a preliminary report from MI5 on what the organisation knew of the men would be given to the parliamentary watchdog on which Blears sits this week.

The former minister's comments will inevitably lead to a debate about whether the coalition rolled back the Prevent policy too dramatically. The Labour government's policy of encouraging local authorities to fund sympathetic Islamic groups was attacked in its latter years by critics who claimed that the government was establishing a network of spies to monitor Muslim communities. It was also claimed that extremist groups had received funding, and the strategy was redrawn in 2011. Funding was removed from organisations that were said not to support "British values" and Prevent funds were to no longer to be used for "community interventions". Blears said the coalition had been mistaken in disengaging from local authorities and focusing Prevent solely on stopping extremists being drawn towards terrorism. She said that the case against Labour's Prevent strategy had proved largely false, with the Home Office reporting in 2011 that there was no evidence of spying nor anything to "indicate widespread, systematic or deliberate funding of extremist groups", although some with extremist ideology had received funding as part of the engagement strategy.

Blears, MP for Salford and Eccles, said: "I am very worried that over the last couple of years, the communities department, which works very closely with local authorities, has abandoned this territory.

"Now the main thrust is with the police. They do a fantastic job but they are dealing with people who are already crossing that line. Counter-extremism isn't just about tackling the people you already know are radicalised. It is about trying to work with local communities before they get to that point so that good decent people in the community can protect young people from being groomed and getting these ideas in the first place and much of what was done in the Prevent programme was about empowering women, young people.

"The police have their own intelligence on the ground and they have neighbourhood policing. They are out and about in the community but in a way it is one side of the picture. Local authority, school governors, people in community groups will have their information as well. The difficulty is when that information is then portrayed as spying on people."

A Home Office spokesman said: "The police cannot and do not deliver Prevent work on their own. We work very closely with local authorities in our priority areas who engage with a range of partners including faith institutions and civil society groups. We also work with other local authorities as required. Prevent is an integral part of our counter-terrorism strategy and aims to stop people from becoming terrorists or supporting terrorism."

Payday lenders 'break pledges on reform'

Citizens Advice survey says firms are still failing to treat customers fairly

Payday lenders have broken a series of promises to reform their industry, including pledges to check that their loans are affordable and to freeze charges when people struggle to repay, according to new research that raises fresh concerns about how they operate.

A survey conducted by Citizens Advice also found that most lenders are failing to remind clients that their loans, which can carry equivalent annual interest rates in excess of 5,000%, are not a long-term fix. Nor do they check whether the borrower can pay back the money.

The findings are likely to be studied closely by MPs and debt counselling organisations who are increasingly concerned about the industry's tactics – which have come into sharp focus during the economic downturn.

Six months on from the launch of an industry charter to deflect criticism of how it operates, evidence to be released on Tuesday by Citizens Advice found lenders had broken 12 of 14 of their industry pledges to treat customers fairly.

A loan tracker service, set up by Citizens Advice examining about 2,000 loans taken out with 113 lenders, found that 87% of lenders did not ask the borrower to provide documents to show they could afford the loan, while 58% failed to explain that the loan should not be used for long-term borrowing.

Of those who had repayment problems with payday loans, seven out of 10 said they had been put under pressure to extend the loan, while 84% said they had not been offered a freeze on interest rates and charges when they said they were struggling to repay. In 95% of cases the lender had not checked to see if the borrower could pay back the loan if it were extended.

"It is a damning indictment of an irresponsible and careless industry that payday lenders have not been serious about their commitment to treat customers fairly," said Gillian Guy, chief executive of Citizens Advice.

In the last four years Citizens Advice bureaux have seen a 10-fold increase in payday loans, sparking concerns that more people are relying on the operators to help them get by.

Citizens Advice gave the typical example of an 18-year-old unemployed person who had received a payday loan of £50 to pay their mobile phone bill, despite telling the lender they lived on just £208 a month. After repaying the loan, they took out another and kept receiving texts and emails offering more. After three months they had racked up loans of £500 coupled with interest charges of £300.

"Borrowers who hoped for a bit of cash to tide them over are now harrowed by debt and find themselves in a vicious cycle of payday loans, without any sign of a way out," Guy said. "It's hugely disappointing that the industry has held its hands up and admitted it could do more – but has completely failed to do so. We want payday lenders to start sticking to their promises and stop ruining people's lives with irresponsible lending."

Citizens Advice, which is calling on the industry to stand by its commitment to treat customers fairly and stop sending them into a spiral of debt, has called on high-street banks to offer personal micro-loans as a responsible alternative.

The Office of Fair Trading is investigating the payday loan industry and has given 50 lenders a 12-week deadline, which expires on Tuesday, to improve. Of those under review, 48 have confirmed that they will provide the OFT with proof that they are fully compliant with their charter, while two of the lenders have surrendered their licences.

"I am very disappointed to see these worrying findings from Citizens Advice," said the consumer minister, Jo Swinson. "Consumers, and particularly those who are most vulnerable and struggling financially, should expect lenders to treat them in a way which matches up to the commitments made in industry codes. This is clearly not happening and more needs to be done to address the problems we are seeing. Tough enforcement and compliance by the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) now, combined with a move to a new regulatory regime under the new Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in 2014, will tackle the real concerns in this market."

In February, Citizens Advice reported four payday lenders to the OFT and called for them to be immediately banned from trading. Last August it provided evidence to the OFT's investigation that saw lender MCO Capital Limited stop trading.

The OFT has opened formal investigations into the practices of three lenders and, in addition, three others have also had their licences revoked since its review of the sector began in March.

"Irresponsible payday lenders are on notice – if you don't clean up your act, the consequences will be severe," Swinson said.

Truth behind the death of suffragette Emily Davison is finally revealed

Hi-tech film analysis suggests Emily Davison's motives when she collided with the king's horse in 1913 were misunderstood

As an emblem of women's emancipation Emily Wilding Davison has always been controversial. The suffragette who was fatally injured at the Epsom racecourse during the Derby 100 years ago under the hooves of the king's horse has been saluted by some as a brave martyr and attacked by others as an irresponsible anarchist. Now detailed analysis of film footage of the incident has shed new light on the contentious moments on 4 June 1913 that were to go down in the history of political protest.

Despite the fact that film technology was in its early days, the incident was captured on three newsreel cameras and a new study of the images has shown that the 40-year-old campaigner was not, as assumed, attempting to pull down Anmer, the royal racehorse, but in fact reaching up to attach a scarf to its bridle.

The analysis, carried out by a team of investigators for a television documentary to be screened tonight on Channel 4, also indicates that the position of Davison before she stepped out on to the track would have given her a clear view of the oncoming race, contrary to the argument that she ran out recklessly to kill herself.

Presenter Clare Balding and investigators Stephen Cole and Mike Dixon returned to the original nitrate film stocks taken on the day and transferred them to a digital format. This was done so that they could be cleaned and so that new software could cross-reference the three different camera angles.

"It has been such an extraordinary adventure to discover more about her, about what she stood for, about the suffragette movement," said Balding this weekend on her work with the team making Secrets of a Suffragette.

"It is hugely significant as a moment in history, a moment that absolutely sums up the desperation of women in this country who wanted the vote."

Historians have suggested that Davison was trying to attach a flag to King George V's horse and police reports suggested two flags were found on her body. Some witnesses believed she was trying to cross the track, thinking the horses had passed by, others believed she had tried to pull down Anmer. The fact that she was carrying a return train ticket from Epsom and had holiday plans with her sister in the near future have also caused some historians to claim that she had no intention of killing herself.

In 2011 the horse-racing historian Michael Tanner argued that as Davison was standing in crowds on the inside of the bend at Tattenham Corner it would have been impossible for her to see the king's horse.

But new cross-referencing between the cameras has revealed, say the C4 programme makers, that Davison was closer to the start of Tattenham Corner than thought and so had a better line of sight. In this position she could have seen and singled out Anmer.

Historians have suggested that Davison and other suffragettes were seen "practising" at grabbing horses in the park near her mother's house and that they then drew lots to determine who should go to the Derby.

After colliding with Anmer, Davison collapsed unconscious on the track. The horse went over, but then rose, completing the race without a jockey. Davison died of her injuries four days later in Epsom Cottage Hospital.

At the funeral of the leading suffragette Emmeline Pankhurst in 1928, the jockey who had ridden Anmer that day, Herbert Jones, laid a wreath "to do honour to the memory of Mrs Pankhurst and Miss Emily Davison". Jones had suffered a mild concussion in the 1913 collision, but afterwards claimed he was "haunted by that poor woman's face".

In 1951, his son found Jones dead in a gas-filled kitchen. The jockey had killed himself.
 

Sample text

Sample Text

Sample Text